Environmental advocates have won a legal challenge against the federal government and mining giant Adani, over its proposed water use at its coal mine in central Queensland.
- Federal Court judge Melissa Perry ruled the Department of Environment “fell into legal error”
- The scheme proposed building a pipeline to pump water into Adani’s Carmichael coal mine
- Environmental advocates say the ruling is “a great win” for farmers and regional communities that depend on water
The Australian Conservation Foundation (ACF) took the Environment Minister to the Federal Court last year, arguing it made an “error of law” when it assessed the planned North Galilee Water Scheme in 2019.
The scheme proposed creating a water pipeline, pump station infrastructure and the expansion of an existing dam catchment, which would then pump water to Adani’s Carmichael mining project.
Lawyers for ACF argued the department should have applied the “water trigger” provision, which falls under the Commonwealth environment protection legislation when assessing the planned scheme.
The trigger weighs up the impacts of coal seam gas and large coal mining developments on rivers.
‘A big plumping project’
During a hearing last October, Neil Williams SC, argued the water extraction was associated with coal mining activity, and therefore the minister should have considered all adverse impacts the action would have.
Stephen Lloyd SC, who is acting for Adani Infrastructure, said because the company was a subsidiary of Adani Mining, its actions should be treated separately.
Mr Lloyd also referred to it as a “big plumbing project”, which does not seek approval to take water.
“We are extracting water to be supplied to a coal miner … [mining is] not part of my client’s actions,” Mr Lloyd told the court.
Today, a Federal Court judge ruled in favour of ACF, granting a judicial review of the minister’s decision to bypass the legislation.
In her published reasons, Justice Melissa Perry said the minister’s delegate erred in his construction of definitions of sections of the relevant act and therefore “fell into legal error”.
“Contrary to the delegates view, an action will involve a large coal mining development for the purposes of the water trigger controlling provisions if the action is so closely associated with the mining of coal as to be integral to it,” she said.
Justice Perry also ordered the defendants pay the environmental group’s legal costs.
‘A great win’ for water protection
In a statement, the ACF Chief Executive Officer Kelly O’Shanassy said it was a “great win” for the protection of water.
Ms O’Shanassy said the judgement would set a “new precedent”.
“This decision will apply to other potential water sources for the Carmichael mine,” she said.
“We expect the federal government to properly apply the law.”
A spokeswoman for Bravus Mining and Resources, formerly Adani, said it would carefully consider the judgement.
“We will now consider our options on the progression of the North Galilee Water Scheme and how we would like to proceed,” it said in a statement.
The statement also said, regardless of the ruling, construction of the Carmichael Coal Mine and Rail Project was “well underway”.
“Importantly, the North Galilee Water Scheme project is not required for these construction activities,” the statement said.
“We have also secured water for the operational phase that does not require the North Galilee Water Scheme.”
In a statement, the federal government said the Department of Environment “will closely consider the decision before making any comment”.